The Portsmouth Road and Its Tributaries: To-Day and in Days of Old — Reading Notes

(2 User reviews)   374
In Category - Geography
Harper, Charles G. (Charles George), 1863-1943 Project Gutenberg 2012 Not confirmed
England -- Description and travel; England -- Social life and customs; Portsmouth Road (England) Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 78,791
Reading time 343 min
Text sections 13

Before opening The Portsmouth Road and Its Tributaries: To-Day and in Days of Old — Reading Notes, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 78,791 words, 5 hr 43 min estimated reading time, and 13 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 27.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “England -- Description and travel,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Charles G. Harper's 1895 travelogue traces the Portsmouth Road from London to the coast, blending contemporary cycling and coaching observations with historical research. The narrative contrasts the modern suburban encroachment on once-wild heathlands with the vanished world of stagecoaches, inns, and forges, using specific landmarks like Hindhead and the 'Seven Thorns' Inn to examine how progress reshapes landscape and memory.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

They were jolly coach-loads that fared along the roads in coaching days, and, truly, all their jollity was needed, for unearthly hours, insufficient protection from inclement weather, and the tolerable certainty of falling in with thieves on their way, were experiences and contingencies that, one might imagine, could scarce fail of depressing the most buoyant spirits. But our forebears were composed of less delicate nerves and tougher thews and sinews than ourselves. Possibly they had not our veneer of refinement; they certainly possessed a most happy ignorance of science and art; of microbes, and all the recondite ailments that perplex us moderns, they knew nothing; they did all their work by that glorious rule, the rule of thumb; and for their food, they lived on roast beef and home-brewed ale, and damned kickshaws, new-fangled notions, gentility, and a hundred other innovations whole-heartedly, like so many Cobbetts. And Cobbett, in very truth, is the pattern and exemplar of the old-time Englishman, who cursed tea, paper money, "gentlemen" farmers, and innumerable things that, innovations then, have long since been cast aside as old-fashioned and out of date.

[Sidenote: _THE ENGLISHMAN OF YORE_]

The Englishman of the days of road-travel was a much more robust person than the Englishman of railway times. He had to be! The weaklings were all killed off by the rigours of the undeniably harder winters than we experience to-day, and by the rough-and-ready conditions of existence that made for the survival of the strongest constitutions. Luxurious times and easier conditions of life breed their own peculiar ills, and the Englishman of a hundred years ago was a very fine animal indeed, who knew little of nerves, and, altogether, compared greatly to his own advantage with his neuralgia-stricken descendants of to-day.

Still, our ancestors saw nothing of the romance of their times. That has been left for us to discover, and that glamour in which we see their age is one afforded only by the lapse of time.

No: coaching days had their romance, more obvious perhaps to ourselves than to those who lived in the times of road-travel; but most certainly they had their own peculiar discomforts which we who are hurled at express speed in luxurious Pullman cars, or in the more exclusive and less sociable "first," to our destination would never endure were railways abolished and the coaching era come again. I should imagine that three-fourths of us would remain at home.

[Sidenote: _COACHING MISERIES_]

Here are some of the coaching miseries experienced by one who travelled before steam had taken the place of good horseflesh, and, sooth to say, there is not much in the nature of romantic glamour attaching to them:--

_Misery number one._ Although your place has been contingently secured some days before, and although you have risen with the lark, yet you see the ponderous vehicle arrive full. And this, not unlikely, more than once.

2. At the end of a stage, beholding the four panting, reeking, foaming animals which have dragged you twelve miles, and the stiff, galled, scraggy relay, crawling and limping out of the yard.

3. Being politely requested, at the foot of a tremendous hill, to ease the horses. Mackintoshes, vulcanized india-rubber, gutta-percha, and gossamer dust-coats unknown then.

4. An outside passenger, resolving to endure no longer "the pelting of the pitiless storm," takes refuge, to your consternation, inside; together with his dripping hat, saturated cloak, and soaked umbrella.

5. Set down with a promiscuous party to a meal bearing no resemblance to that of a good hotel, excepting in the charge; and no time allowed in which to enjoy it.

6. Closely packed in a box, "cabin'd, cribb'd, confin'd, bound in," with _five_ companions morally or physically obnoxious, for two or three comfortless days and nights.

7. During a halt overhearing the coarse language of the ostlers and the tipplers of the roadside pot-house: and besieged with beggars exposing their horrible mutilations.

8. Roused from your fitful nocturnal slumber by the horn or bugle; the lashing and cracking of whips; the noisy arrivals at turnpike gates, or by a search for parcels (which, after all, are not there) under your seat: to say nothing of solicitous drivers who pester you with their entirely uncalled-for attentions.

9. Discovering, at a diverging-point in your journey, that the "Tally-ho" coach runs only every other day or so, or that it has been finally stopped.

10. Clambering from the wheel by various iron projections to your elevated seat, fearful, all the while, of breaking your precious neck.

11. After threading the narrowest streets of an ancient town, entering the inn-yard by a low archway, at the imminent risk of decapitation.

12. Seeing the luggage piled "Olympus high," so as to occasion an alarming oscillation.

13. Having the reins and whip placed in your unpractised hands while coachee indulges in a glass and chat.

14. To be, when dangling at the edge of a seat, overcome with drowsiness.

15. Exposed to piercing draughts, owing to a refractory glass; or, _vice versâ_, being in a minority, you are compelled, for the sake of ventilation, to thrust your umbrella accidentally through a pane.

16. At various seasons, suffocated with dust and broiled by a powerful sun; or crouching under an umbrella in a drenching rain--or petrified with cold--torn by fierce winds--struggling through snow--or wending your way through perilous floods.

17. Perceiving that a young squire is receiving an initiatory lesson into the art of driving; or that a jibbing horse, or a race with an opposition coach, is endangering your existence.

18. Losing the enjoyment, or employment, of much precious time, not only on the road, but also from subsequent fatigue.

19. Interrupted by your two rough-coated, big-buttoned, many-caped friends, the coachman and guard, who hope you will remember them before the termination of your hurried meal. Although the gratuity has been frequently calculated in anticipation, you fail in making the mutual reminiscences agreeable.

Clearly this was no _laudator temporis acti_.

But there are two sides to every medal, and it would be quite as easy to draw up an equally long and convincing list of the joys of coaching. It was not always raining or snowing when you wished to go a journey. Highwaymen were always too many, but they did not lurk in every lane; and the coach was not overturned on every journey, nor, even when a coach _did_ upset, were the spilled passengers killed and injured with the revolting circumstance and hideous complexity of a railway accident. On a trip by coach, it was possible to see something of the country and to fill one's lungs with fresh air, instead of coal-smoke and sulphur--and so forth, _ad infinitum_!

[Sidenote: _THE COACHING AGE_]

The Augustan age of coaching,--by which I mean the period when George IV. was king,--was celebrated for the number of gentlemen-drivers who ran smart coaches upon the principal roads from London. Many of them mounted the box-seat for the sake of sport alone: others, who had run through their property and come to grief after the manner of the time, became drivers of necessity. They could fulfil no other useful occupation, for at that day professionalism was confined only to the Ring, and although professors of the Noble Art of Self-Defence were admired and (in a sense) envied, they were not gentlemen, judge them by what standard you please. What was a poor Corinthian to do? To beg he would have been ashamed, to dig would have humiliated him no less; the only way to earn a living and yet retain the respect of his fellows, was to become a stage-coachman. He had practically no alternative. Not yet had the manly sports of cricket and football produced their professionals; lawn-tennis and cycling were not dreamed of, and the professional riders, the "makers' amateurs," subsidized heavily from Coventry, were a degraded class yet to be evolved by the young nineteenth century. So coachmen the young Randoms and Rake-hells of the times became, and let us do them the justice to admit that when they possessed handles to their names, they had the wit and right feeling to see that those accidents of their birth gave them no licence to assume "side" in the calling they had chosen for the love of sport or from the spur of necessity. If they were proud by nature, they pocketed their pride. They drove their best, took their fares, and pocketed their tips with the most ordinary members of the coaching fraternity, and they were a jolly band. Such were Sir St. Vincent Cotton; Stevenson of the "Brighton Age," a graduate he of Trinity College, Cambridge; and Captain Tyrwhitt Jones.

[Sidenote: _GENTLEMEN COACHMEN_]

St. Vincent Cotton, known familiarly to his contemporaries as "Vinny," was one who drove a coach for a livelihood, and was not ashamed to own it. He became reduced, as a consequence of his own folly, from an income of five thousand a year to nothing; but he took Fortune's frowns with all the nonchalance of a true sportsman, and was to all appearance as light-hearted when he drove for a weekly wage as when he handled the reins upon his own drag.

"One day," says one who knew him, "an old friend booked a place and got up on the box-seat beside him, and a jolly five hours they had behind one of the finest teams in England. When they came to their journey's end, the friend was rather put to it as to what he ought to do; but he frankly put out his hand to shake hands, and offered him a sovereign. 'No, no,' said the coachman. 'Put that in your pocket, and give me the half-crown you give to another coachman; and always come by me, and tell all your friends and my old friends to do the same. A sovereign might be all very well for once, but if you think that necessary for to-day you would not like to feel it necessary the many times in the year you run down this way. Half-a-crown is the trade price. Stick to that, and let us have many a merry meeting and talk of old times.'"

"What was right," says our author, "he took as a matter of course in his business, as I can testify by what happened between him and two of my young brothers. They had to go to school at the town to which their old friend the new coachman drove. Of course they would go by him whom they had known all their little lives. They booked their places and paid their money, and were proud to sit behind their friend with such a splendid team.

"The Baronet chaffed and had fun with the boys, as he was always hail-fellow-well-met with every one, old and young, all the way down; and at the end, when he shook hands and did not see them prepare to give him anything, he said, as they were turning away, 'Now, you young chaps, hasn't your father given you anything for the coachman?'

"'Yes,' they said, looking sheepish, 'he gave us two shillings each, but we didn't know what to do: we daren't give it to you.'

"'Oh,' said he, 'it's all right. You hand it over to me and come back with me next holidays, and bring me a coach-full of your fellows. Good-bye.'"

"I drive for a livelihood," said the Baronet to a friend. "Jones, Worcester, and Stevenson have their liveried servants behind, who pack the baggage and take all short fares and pocket all the fees. That's all very well for them. I do all myself, and the more civil I am (particularly to the old ladies) the larger fees I get." And with that he stowed away a trunk in the boot, and turning down the steps, handed into the coach, with the greatest care and civility, a fat old woman, saying as he remounted the box, "There, that will bring me something like a fee."

The Baronet made three hundred a year out of this coach, and got his sport out of it for nothing.

The "Rocket," and the other fashionable West-end coaches of the Regency and George IV.'s reign, scorning the plebeian starting-point of the "Elephant and Castle," whence the second and third-rate coaches, the "rumble-tumbles" and the stage-wagons set out, took their departure from the old City inns, and, calling at the Piccadilly hostelries on their way, crossed the Thames at Putney, even as Captain Hargreaves' modern Portsmouth "Rocket" did in the notable coaching revival some years since, and as Mr. Shoolbred's Guildford coach, the "New Times," does now.

[Sidenote: _OLD PUTNEY BRIDGE_]

Here they paid their tolls at the old bridge--eighteenpence a time--and laboriously toiled up the long hill that leads to Putney Heath, not without some narrow escapes of the "outsiders" from having their heads brought into sudden and violent contact with the archway of the old toll-house that--though by no means picturesque in itself--was so strange and curious an object in its position, straddling across the roadway.

What Londoner worthy the name does not regret the old crazy, timbered bridge that connected Fulham with Putney? Granted that it was inconveniently narrow, and humped in unexpected places, like a dromedary; conceded that its many and mazy piers obstructed navigation and hindered the tides; allowing every objection against it, old Putney Bridge was infinitely more interesting than the present one of stone that sits so low in the water and offends the eye with its matter-of-fact regularity, proclaiming fat contracts and the unsympathetic baldness of outline characteristic of the engineer's most admired efforts.

Perhaps an artist sees beauty where less privileged people discover only ugliness; how else shall I account for the singular preference of the guide-book, in which I read that "the ugly wooden bridge was replaced in 1886 by an elegant granite structure"?

Old Putney Bridge could never have been anything else than picturesque, from the date of its opening, in 1729, to its final demolition twelve years ago: the new bridge will never be less than ugly and formal, and an eyesore in the broad reach that was spanned so finely by the old timber structure for over a hundred and fifty years. The toll for one person walking across the bridge was but a halfpenny, but it frequently happened in the old days that people had not even that small coin to pay their passage, and in such cases it was the recognized custom for the tollman to take their hats for security. The old gatekeepers of Putney Bridge were provided with impressive-looking gowns and wore something the appearance of beadles. Also they were provided with stout staves, which frequently came in useful during the rows which were continually occurring upon the occasions when wayfarers had their hats snatched off. "Your halfpenny or your hat" was an offensive cry, and, together with the scuffles with strayed revellers, left little peace to the guardians of the bridge.

[Sidenote: _SUBURBS_]

Everything is altered here since the old coaching-days; everything, that is to say, but the course of the river and the trim churches of Fulham and Putney, whose towers rise in rivalry from either shore. And Putney church-tower is altogether dwarfed by the huge public-house that stands opposite: a flaunting insult scarcely less flagrant than the shame put upon the House of God by Cromwell and his fellows who sate in council of war in the chancel, and discussed battles and schemed strife and bloodshed over the table sacred to the Lord's Communion. Putney has suffered from its nearness to London. Where, until ten years ago, old mansions and equally old shops lined its steep High Street, there are now only rows of pretentious frontages occupied by up-to-date butchers and bakers and candlestick-makers; by drapers, milliners, and "stores" of the suburban, or five miles radius, variety. Gone is "Fairfax House," most impressive and dignified of suburban mansions, dating from the time of James I., and sometime the headquarters of the "Army of God and the Parliament"; gone, too, is Gibbon's birthplace, and the very church is partly rebuilt--although _that_ is a crime of which our forebears of 1836 are guilty. It is guilt, you will allow, who stand on the bridge and look down upon the mean exterior brick walls of the nave, worse still by comparison with the rough, weathered stones of the old tower. Every part of the church was rebuilt then, except that tower, and though the Perpendicular nave-arcade was set up again, it has been scraped and painted to a newness that seems quite of a piece with other "improvements." All the monuments, too, were moved into fresh places when the general post of that sixty-years-old "restoration" was in progress. The dainty chantry of that notable native of Putney, Bishop West, who died in 1533, was removed from the south aisle to the chancel, and the ornate monument to Richard Lussher placed in the tower, as one enters the church from the street.

Richard Lussher was not a remarkable man, or if he was the memory of his extraordinary qualities has not been handed down to us. But if he was not remarkable, his epitaph is, as you shall judge:--

"Here lyeth y{e} body of Ric: Lussher of Puttney in y{e} Conty of Surey, Esq: who married Mary, y{e} second daughter of George Scott of Staplefoord, tanner, in y{e} Conty of Essex, Esq: he departed y{s} lyfe y{e} 27{th} of September, An{o}o 1618. Aetatis sue 30.

"What tounge can speake y{e} Vertues of y{s} Creature? Whose body fayre, whose soule of rarer feature; He livd a Saynt, he dyed an holy wight, In Heaven on earth a Joyfull heavy sight. Body, Soule united, agreed in one. Lyke strings well tuned in an unison, No discord harsh y{s} navell could untye. 'Twas Heauen y{e} earth y{s} musick did envye; Wherefore may well be sayd he lived well, & being dead, y{e} World his vertues tell."

Some scornful commentator has called this doggerel; but I would that all doggerel were as interesting.

[Sidenote: _HISTORIC FIGURES_]

We have already heard of one Cromwell at Putney, but another of the same name, Thomas Cromwell,--almost as great a figure in the history of England as "His Highness" the Protector,--was born here, a good deal over a hundred years before warty-faced Oliver came and set his men in array against the King's forces from Oxford. Thomas was the son of a blacksmith whose forge stood somewhere in the neighbourhood of the Wandsworth Road, on a site now lost; but though of such humble origin he rose to be a successor of Wolsey, that romantic figure whom we shall meet lower down the road, at Esher, who himself was of equally lowly birth, being but the son of a butcher. But while Wolsey,--that "butcher's dogge," as some jealous contemporary called him,--rendered much service to the Church, Cromwell, like his namesake, had a genius for destruction, and became a veritable _malleus ecclesia_. He it was who, unscrupulous and servile in attendance upon the King's freaks, unctuous in flatteries of that Royal paragon of vanity, sought and obtained the Chancellorship of England, by suggesting that Henry should solve all his difficulties with Rome by establishing a national Church of which he should be head. No surer way of rising to the kingly favour could have been devised. Henry listened to his adviser and took his advice, and Thomas Cromwell rose immediately to the highest pinnacle of power, a lofty altitude which in those times often turned men giddy and lost them their heads, in no figurative sense. None so bitter and implacable towards an old faith than those who, having once held it, have from one reason or another embraced new views; and Cromwell was no exception from this rule. He was most zealous and industrious in the work of disestablishing the religious houses, and the most rapacious in securing a goodly share of the spoils. He was a terror to the homeless monks and religious brethren whom his untiring industry had sent to beg their bread upon the roads, and "fierce laws, fiercely executed--an unflinching resolution which neither danger could daunt nor saintly virtue move to mercy--a long list of solemn tragedies weigh upon his memory."

Charles G. Harper opens The Portsmouth Road and Its Tributaries by situating his work within a late-Victorian revival of interest in England's old coach-roads, a resurgence he attributes to amateur coaching enthusiasts, the cycling craze, and a contemplative spirit drawn to scenes of bygone commerce. The book itself, published in 1895, is the fruit of two years' research among 'musty, dusty files of by-gone newspapers' and country jaunts for notes and sketches. Harper's voice is that of a seasoned topographical writer—he had already published The Brighton Road and From Paddington to Penzance—and his method is to interweave present-day observations with historical anecdote, creating a layered portrait of a highway in transition.

The Road as a Living Archive

Harper treats the Portsmouth Road not merely as a route but as a repository of layered histories. He pauses at the 'Huts' Inn, now rebranded as the 'Royal Huts' Hotel, and imagines the reaction of William Cobbett, the early-nineteenth-century radical writer who had scorned such pretensions. The inn's transformation from a humble wayside stop to a hotel catering to a suburbanizing clientele is for Harper a symptom of a broader shift: the wild heathland of Hindhead, once a 'howling' wilderness, is being carved into building plots. He notes with irony that Professor John Tyndall, who built a house there in 1882 for seclusion and health, inadvertently sparked the very popularity he sought to avoid. Tyndall's screens—erected to block the view of a neighboring house—become a monument to his reclusive temperament, a physical trace of a personal preference that Harper reads as a commentary on the tension between solitude and suburban sprawl.

Signs, Names, and the Weight of Legend

Harper is alert to the stories encoded in place names and inn signs. At the 'Seven Thorns' Inn, a lonely roadside house on a barren stretch of road, he finds the sign 'singular' and wonders whether it is 'descriptive or legendary.' He admits that no legend has reached him, and that the seven thorns themselves are 'simply non-existent,' yet he cannot resist comparing the sign to the 'average Clapham "Rosebank"'—a suburban villa name with no roses. This wry observation reveals Harper's method: he juxtaposes the romantic expectations raised by old names with the prosaic realities of the present. Similarly, he dissects the etymology of Thursley, rejecting a scholarly derivation from the god Thor via 'Hammer Ponds' because those ponds are actually remnants of old iron forges. The landscape, for Harper, is a palimpsest where myth and industry compete for meaning, and he prefers the tangible evidence of forge pits to the allure of Norse mythology.

The Texture of the Land: Gravel, Gorse, and the Ungrateful Soil

Harper's descriptive eye is drawn to the physical character of the countryside, especially its harshness. On the descent toward Liphook, he notes the 'fine gravelly road, closely compacted and well kept,' but the surrounding land is 'wild and unfertile,' nourishing only gorse and hardy grasses. The trees are 'wind-tossed and scraggy,' a sign of the poor soil. Even on a summer's day, the vicinity of the 'Seven Thorns' lacks 'the suavity of generous land, prolific of fine timber and graceful foliage.' This is not picturesque England of rolling meadows; it is a landscape of 'nakedness' and 'harsh sand and gravel.' Harper's prose conveys a tactile sense of the terrain—the crunch of gravel underfoot, the sparse vegetation, the long perspectives of road with 'never a house in sight.' His appreciation is unsentimental, grounded in the material realities of travel and habitation, and he finds a certain austere beauty in the very ungratefulness of the soil.

Harper's book rewards readers who enjoy a companionable guide with a sharp eye for contradiction—the way a road can be both a modern thoroughfare and a relic of a slower age. He is at his best when he lets a detail, like Tyndall's screens or the empty sign of the 'Seven Thorns,' open onto larger questions about how we inhabit and remember place. The Portsmouth Road, in his hands, becomes a thread connecting the coachman's vanished world to the cyclist's present, and the reader is invited to follow that thread with curiosity and a tolerance for digression.

There are days I still think of Harper’s vanished coaching inns, and how he mourned their quiet passing. It made me wonder about other landscapes we lose while looking ahead. That same gentle ache surfaced when I first turned the pages of The Cape Peninsula: Pen and Colour Sketches — Edition Insights, its colours holding a moment before it, too, slipped away.

William Brown
1 week ago

Sofia Wright
1 month ago

4
4 out of 5 (2 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
  • ...
    Victoria Morrow - 1 month ago
    {'rating': 5, 'text': 'A wonderful historical account of the Portsmouth Road, enriched with vivid descriptions of the towns, inns, and characters that once thrived along this ancient route. The author blends past and present seamlessly, making history come alive. With fascinating anecdotes and local legends, this book is a must-read for anyone interested in the social history of England and classic road travel.'}

  • ...
    Carl Moore - 4 weeks ago
    {'rating': 2, 'text': "The book is outdated and occasionally inaccurate in its historical recounting. The author's rambling style makes it tiresome to read, and the lack of modern maps or illustrations hampers understanding of the geography. It feels more like a collection of trivia than a coherent historical narrative. Not recommended for casual readers."}

  • ...
    Timothy Fisher - 3 weeks ago
    {'rating': 3, 'text': 'An interesting and well-researched book that traces the history of the Portsmouth Road. It is full of details about coaching inns and landmarks, but the narrative can be a bit dry and fragmented, hopping from one location to another. A helpful read for local historians, but not a gripping story for the general reader.'}


Reader reflection

What was your reading experience?

Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How easy was the book to follow?

Related eBooks