The Expeditions of Zebulon Montgomery Pike, Volume 2 (of 3) To Headwaters of the Mississippi River Through Louisiana Territory, and in New Spain, During the Years — Themes and Context
Edition facts
The Expeditions of Zebulon Montgomery Pike, Volume 2 (of 3) To Headwaters of the Mississippi River Through Louisiana Territory, and in New Spain, During the Years — Themes and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 215,412 words, 15 hr 37 min estimated reading time, and 20 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 18.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Mississippi River -- Description and travel,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ITINERARY: UP THE MISSOURI AND OSAGE RIVERS, AND THROUGH KANSAS TO THE PAWNEE VILLAGE ON THE REPUBLICAN RIVER, JULY 15TH-SEPTEMBER 30TH, 1806, 357-416
ITINERARY, CONTINUED: FROM THE PAWNEE VILLAGE THROUGH KANSAS AND COLORADO TO PIKE'S PEAK, OCTOBER 1ST-NOVEMBER 30TH, 1806, 417-459
ITINERARY, CONCLUDED: IN THE MOUNTAINS OF COLORADO ON HEADWATERS OF THE ARKANSAW AND RIO GRANDE, DECEMBER 1ST, 1806-FEBRUARY 26TH, 1807, 460-510
PIKE'S DISSERTATION ON LOUISIANA, 511-538
WILKINSON'S REPORT ON THE ARKANSAW, 539-561
CORRESPONDENCE, 562-594
ITINERARY: THROUGH NEW MEXICO ON THE RIO GRANDE TO EL PASO, FEBRUARY 27TH-MARCH 21ST, 1807, 595-647
ITINERARY, CONTINUED: THROUGH OLD MEXICO, IN CHIHUAHUA, DURANGO, AND COAHUILA, TO THE PRESIDIO GRANDE, MARCH 22D-MAY 31ST, 1807, 648-689
ITINERARY, CONCLUDED: THROUGH TEXAS TO NATCHITOCHES ON THE RED RIVER OF LOUISIANA, JUNE 1ST-JULY 1ST, 1807, 690-717
OBSERVATIONS ON NEW SPAIN, 718-806
CORRESPONDENCE, 807-839
CONGRESSIONAL REPORT AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS, 840-856
_THE ARKANSAW JOURNEY._
ITINERARY: UP THE MISSOURI AND OSAGE RIVERS, AND THROUGH KANSAS TO THE PAWNEE VILLAGE ON THE REPUBLICAN RIVER, JULY 15TH-SEPT. 30TH, 1806.
Tuesday, July 15th, 1806. We sailed from the landing at Belle Fontaine[I-1] about 3 o'clock p. m., in two boats. Our party consisted of two lieutenants, one surgeon, one sergeant, two corporals, 16 privates and one interpreter.[I-2] We had also under our charge chiefs of the Osage and Pawnees, who, with a number of women and children, had been to Washington. These Indians had been redeemed from captivity among the Potowatomies, and were now to be returned to their friends at the Osage towns. The whole number of Indians amounted to 51.
We ascended the river about six miles, and encamped on the south side behind an island. This day my boat swung around twice; once when we had a tow-rope on shore, which it snapped off in an instant. The Indians did not encamp with us at night. Distance six miles.[I-3]
_July 16th._ We rejoined our red brethren at breakfast, after which we again separated, and with very severe labor arrived late in the evening opposite the village of St. Charles,[I-4] where the Indians joined us. Distance 15 miles.
_July 17th._ We crossed the river to learn if any communications had arrived from St. Louis, and if there was any news of other Indian enemies of the Osages. Called at Mr. James Morrison's, and was introduced to Mr. [George] Henry, of New Jersey, about 28 years of age; he spoke a little Spanish and French tolerably well; he wished to go with me as a volunteer. From this place I wrote letters back to Belle Fontaine, whilst the Indians were crossing the river. A man by the name of Ramsay reported to the Indians that 500 Sacs, Ioways, and Reynards were at the mouth of Big Manitou [_i. e._, the band under Pashepaho (Stabber) and Quashquame (Lance)]. This gave them considerable uneasiness, and it took me some time to do away the impression it made upon them, for I by no means believed it. We were about sailing when my interpreter [Vasquez] was arrested by the sheriff at the suit of Manuel De Liza [or Lisa[I-5]], for a debt between $300 and $400, and was obliged to return to St. Louis. This made it necessary for me to write another letter to the general.[I-6] We encamped about three-fourths of a mile above the village.
_July 18th._ Lieutenant Wilkinson and Dr. Robinson went with [one soldier and] the Indians across the country to the village of La Charette.[I-7] Mr. George Henry engaged, under oath, to accompany me on my tour. Wrote to the general, and inclosed him one of Henry's engagements.[I-8] After we had made our little arrangements we marched by land and joined the boats, which had sailed early [in charge of Sergeant Ballenger], at twelve o'clock. Two of the men being sick, I steered one boat and Mr. Henry the other, by which means we were enabled to keep employed our full complement of oars, although we put the sick men on shore. Encamped on the north side. About eleven at night a tremendous thunderstorm arose, and it continued to blow and rain, with thunder and lightning, until day. Distance 15 miles.[I-9]
_July 19th._ In consequence of the rain we did not put off until past nine o'clock; my sick men marched. I had some reason to suspect that one of them [Kennerman[I-10]] intended never joining us again. At dinner time the sick man of my own boat came on board; I then went on board the other, and we continued to run races all day. Although this boat had hitherto kept behind, yet I arrived at the encamping ground with her nearly half an hour before the other. The current not generally so strong as below. Distance 14 miles.[I-11]
Pike's narrative in this volume is a study in contrasts: the brisk, factual tone of his daily itineraries sits uneasily alongside the elaborate, self-justifying language of his official letters. In one passage, he describes his papers as 'an undigested mass' and laments his weak eyes and chest pain, yet he also boasts of possessing 'immense matter' that opens 'a wide and splendid field for harvests of honor.' This tension between exhaustion and ambition pervades the text.
Elliott Coues's editorial apparatus adds another layer, with footnotes that correct, expand, or question Pike's claims. The result is a layered document—part travelogue, part political report, part scholarly reconstruction—where the reader must weigh Pike's words against the editor's annotations.
The Itinerary Voice: Precision and Omission
Pike's chapter headings read like stripped-down logs: 'Up the Missouri and Osage Rivers, and through Kansas to the Pawnee Village on the Republican River, July 15th-September 30th, 1806.' The prose inside is similarly lean, recording distances, directions, and encounters with minimal embellishment. Yet this apparent objectivity is itself a rhetorical choice. By omitting personal reactions or descriptive flourishes, Pike presents himself as a reliable, scientific observer—a persona that contrasts sharply with the more emotional, defensive tone of his correspondence.
Coues's footnotes frequently intervene to clarify or correct these terse entries. For instance, when Pike mentions a location or a Native American group, Coues supplies modern names, historical context, or cross-references to other explorers' accounts. This editorial presence reminds the reader that the itinerary is not a transparent record but a constructed narrative, shaped by Pike's priorities and later scrutinized by a scholar.
The Letter as Performance: Defense and Self-Promotion
Pike's correspondence, especially the long letter to General Wilkinson excerpted here, reveals a different register. The sentences grow longer, the vocabulary more ornate: he writes of 'the anxious desires of the miser, and the waking thoughts and sleeping dreams of the man of ambitious and aspiring soul.' This is not the language of a field report but of a man arguing for his own importance. He defends his decisions—such as not allowing his sergeant to join him—and emphasizes the hardships he endured, from mutilated papers to physical pain.
At the same time, Pike is careful to flatter his superiors and propose future projects. He offers to compile 'the compleatest survey of Louisiana ever yet taken' and hints at his desire to travel to Washington. The letter thus functions as both a justification and a bid for continued patronage, its rhetorical flourishes masking the precariousness of his situation.
Coues's Editorial Lens: Annotating Uncertainty
Elliott Coues, a former army surgeon and editor of Lewis and Clark, brings a critical eye to Pike's text. His footnotes do not simply explain obscure terms; they actively interrogate Pike's claims. For example, when Pike mentions that the sergeant killed one of his men, Coues adds a note (V'-7) that quotes a letter from General Salcedo accusing the sergeant of 'great intractability.' This juxtaposition of sources allows the reader to see the same event from multiple perspectives.
Coues also flags inconsistencies and gaps. He notes where Pike's page numbering continues from Volume 1, and where footnotes were missing or had to be approximated. By preserving the original's 'inconsistent spelling and hyphenation' while correcting 'obvious typographical errors,' Coues creates a text that is both faithful to the 1810 edition and critically annotated. The result is a scholarly edition that acknowledges its own limitations.
Readers approaching this volume should attend to the interplay between Pike's voice and Coues's annotations. The narrative is not a seamless account but a patchwork of genres—itinerary, letter, report—each with its own conventions and biases. Pay particular attention to moments where Pike's tone shifts, or where Coues's footnotes introduce doubt. These are the points at which the text reveals its constructed nature, and where the most interesting questions about exploration, authority, and memory arise.
Reading Pike’s defensive letters, I felt that ache of distance—so much effort poured into words that might never catch up with him. It reminded me of the same solitary patience in Sven Hedin’s wanderings, where every step was a quiet argument with the unknown. There is a strange comfort in that shared, human strain across Trans-Himalaya: Discoveries and Adventurers in Tibet. Vol. 1 (of 2) — Background and Themes, as if we, too, are just passing through.
Michael Harris
2 weeks agoSebastian Wright
3 weeks agoOwen Hall
1 month ago-
Lori Vickie Guzman - 1 month ago
This volume presents Pike's journals with extensive footnotes that enhance understanding. The firsthand accounts are remarkable. However, the language is archaic and the narrative jumps around, making it hard to follow at times. For those interested in early American exploration, it's a necessary read, but it requires patience. -
Emily Carpenter - 3 weeks ago
The Expeditions Of Zebulon Montgomery Pike is an invaluable historical document that sheds light on the American frontier. Volume 2 covers Pike's explorations through the Louisiana Territory and into Spanish lands, offering detailed observations of geography, Native American tribes, and challenges faced. The editors provide helpful annotations. This is a treasure for history buffs and essential reading for understanding the mapping of the American West. -
Brett Shane Hale - 1 week ago
As a historical record, this book has some value, but I found it tedious to read. The expedition diaries are often repetitive and lack the narrative flair of similar works like Lewis and Clark. The editing is overly academic, with footnotes interrupting the flow. Unless you're a specialist, you might want to skip this dense tome.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.
Benjamin Thomas
1 month ago